A lot of nonsense gets talking in the soy-osphere about thots™ and the danger to Western Civilisation™ caused by female promiscuity.
Get it into your heads, idiots: female promiscuity has made this one of the greatest times to be alive as a single man in the entire history of the planet!
As usual with debates of this time, things get taken to extremes for effect—reductio ad absurdum.
So guys will be like: ‘Oh, so if she’s slept with 100 guys before lunch and her pussy is filled with their intermingled sperm then that’s OK with you is it, Troy? That’s the kind of woman you go for?’
No, of course not.
It’s a straw man argument. Do I, in my personal life, deliberately seek out women with high body counts? Of course not.
I like an innocent, wholesome lady as much as the next man.
But neither do I throw the baby out with the bathwater by shaming women for their sexual behaviour. Because that behaviour has ensured that I’ve had a very prolific and varied sex life over the years.
And if you are reading this, and you are a man, then don’t tell me that you don’t crave exactly the same thing.
(OK, you might be married and not wanting to cheat. Fine. But none of us can deny that the fundamental masculine imperative is ‘unlimited access to unlimited sexuality’ (Rollo))
That being the case, how can a rise in female promiscuity have done anything other than assist men in their own imperative?
Female Promiscuity
But now we get into percentages. “But Troy—women are only sleeping with the top 20% of men! What about the 80% of men who are betas and who are left begging for the scraps”
Well, maybe—although I’d like to see a proper, rigorous study done in this area, since the reality, at street level, seems to be that even male 6 chuds are getting laid, albeit with less attractive women.
But even assuming the 80/20 thing is true, what should we all do about it?
The response of the trad cons is to cry about it.
To say ‘society is wrong, and therefore we need to change society. Remember the good old 1950s when it was one woman for one man? Well, we should go back to that!!! We need strong men who grow beards and own guns to reinstate the patriarchy and keep women under control.’
Listen to me: it’s a fairytale! It’s garbage! It’s not going to happen!
You might as well start writing blogs and Tweets about how we need alien intervention to reset the sexual market. Because the idea that a bunch of earnest chin-strokers with a Trump fetish are going to turn back the clock on social history is, frankly, laughable.
You ain’t turning the clock back—if anything, the hands on that clock are spinning faster than you can even imagine. So forget your white picket-fence cod-Christian moralising, and try being practical instead.
Me personally, I am a pragmatist. Whatever situation I walk into, I look at it head on and I think ‘OK, how can I get the best out of this for me.’
Pretty simple, right—-and yet apparently that passes for radical though these days.
Anyway, here’s the thing. You look at society and you see promiscuity and you see an apparently unfair distribution of sex.
Faced with that, my natural instinct is to think: ‘OK, so how do I get into that top 20% of men…or at least, how do I make it so it appears I’m in that percentile?’
It seems to me that the more pressing problem facing men today is a lack of responsibility. For rather than seeing the sexual markeplace as it currently is as a huge theatre of opportunity, instead they see it as a something that should be changed. That women should be made to conform to some outdated standard against their will.
But isn’t this just as bad as feminists saying that men should change their evolved nature?
And more importantly, we all know full-well that 99.999% of men would sleep with a “thot” 9 if the opportunity presented itself.
My point is that there is little use in railing against the status quo. Because it’s not just “society” you’re seeking to change, but human beings. Read Sex at Dawn by Chris Ryan and you’ll see that women in pre-agrarian times were promiscuous in a polygamous framework.
It was only after the agricultural revolution that monogamy came into vogue. And monogamy itself has always been a facade, as you’ll know if you’ve ever read a Victorian novel, or Seneca, or seen a Shakespeare play.
You’re not going to rewire thousands of years-old biological programming with your Twitter feed.
Instead, look at the game as it is being played, and work out how you can win.
Fortunately these days there are amazing resources to help you do just that.
For one, you can currently buy all 8 of my game / dating books in a bundle called The Renegade Dating Blueprint for just $47 (reduced from $69) here.
And you can also check out the brand-new course by kickboxing champion, multi-millionaire playboy with a harem of 7 girls Andrew Tate, called How To Get Girls.
Forget all the soy crap written by purple pill coaches online and find out how a real G does it.
Live the life you want, not the life you think you should.
To read more about modern dating, go here.
