As you may have noticed, right now I’m in the middle of an ‘infields’ project, by which I mean I am shooting videos of me chatting to girls and then putting them on YouTube (with all identities concealed, of course).
I don’t know how much longer I’ll continue doing this for, and I don’t know how long I’ll leave the videos up for, either.
But for now, they are all there to see on my Youtube channel, and I encourage you to bathe in their glory.
Saturday was a particularly busy day. I spent four hours filming in the morning and then a further FIVE hours doing daygame coaching with a client. That’s over nine hours of street time. Suffice to say I was pretty knackered afterwards and did very little at all over the rest of the Bank Holiday weekend.
But that’s by-the-by. I’ve just put up the first infield from that session, a video of me talking to a charming Bulgarian girl in London’s Covent Garden. I’ve lightly edited it to remove personal details, but it pretty much shows the whole 6-ish minute conversation as it happened.
(The opener right at the beginning is cut off as my cameraman wasn’t quite ready. I think I just said ‘Hey’ or ‘Excuse me’ or something).
Natural Style Daygame
What you find when you publish a bunch of daygame infield videos is that you will get a lot of ‘feedback’ from people, both good and bad, and a lot of it contradictory. I’ve now put up 12 approach videos, and I’ve had people saying that I’m robotic, that I stick slavishly to the London Daygame Model . . . and that I don’t follow it at all.
To clarify my position on this, I am not a LDM purist by any means. If anything I lean more towards what you might call ‘natural style daygame’.
That said, LDM provides such a rigorous structure for a daygame approach that it’s pretty much impossible to disregard entirely . . . if only because LDM was itself based on Mystery Method, which in turn was based on the primal template for human seduction that has existed down the centuries.
As such it’s fair to say that I observe the overall structure of LDM in most of my approaches, and I also use some of the lines those guys used because, well, they’re good lines.
But after the opener I’m much more inclined to improvise, getting into a more natural conversation and spiking it up with teasing and double entendres before asking for contact details.
In the following video I purposefully keep things loose as I wanted to show that you can deviate from the LDM and still get a positive reaction.
You will see how I chat to this girl normally, but am careful to ensure that it doesn’t slide into friendly chat by telling her she has pretty eyes, teasing her about being a bad girl, as well as my posture, eye contact etc.
Anyway, have a look and let me know what you think.
Join Troy’s FREE email list for a premium article every day packed with game tips and advice that you won’t find anywhere else here.
To own all 9 of Troy’s dating / game books for just $35 (full value $250) go here
To book daygame coaching with Troy email troy@realtroyfrancis.com
To learn more about modern dating go here.
